Journeys From A Small Room

Sigma 8-16mm on Eos M

Sigma 8-16mm on Eos M

Sigma 8-16mm on Eos M

Sigma 8-16mm f/4.5-5.6 DC HSM Lens

Sigma 8-16mm on Eos M5

Sigma 8-16mm on Eos M5

Sigma 8-16mm on Eos M5

The Last in my look at my lenses with the Eos Mirrorless system. The Sigma 8-16mm f/4.5-5.6 DC HSM , remember i commented it being the “elephant in the room” next to other lenses in my collection. It is as such as it is a complete departure from my Canon lenses. Elephant, yes regards its weight and super quality build. More of that in a minute.

I have been for the last 7 years using the Tamron 10-24mm Di II. Did me as my main workhorse, as Landscape and architecture are my main photography preferences. As you are aware though that on an APSC camera that makes it (in FF terms) a 16- 38mm equivalent, not as wide as I would really like. I have been aware of the Sigma 8-16mm for a while now and was very interested in it’s 12-25mm FF equivalency. Could i really get a Ultra Wide angle lens without going “fish-eye”, it seemed that I could. A true Rectilinear lens, with reasonably good online reviews on its abilities and most important at this range- distortion and sharpness.

All for a price. So after many years of waiting for prices to drop, opportunities to arise, I saw a 2nd hand one for sale, locally, about a month before my birthday. Sold the Tamron, and put the money towards it. It came with its own Sigma ,zip top, padded lens bag. Weighed in at 550g or half a kilo, phew! and that is without the adaptor added on, I was so worried it was going to dwarf my Eos M.

Now at f/4.5-5.6 its a long way from the fast lenses that everyone raves about, but remember its for landscape and things that don’t move, like buildings etc.  Living in a fairly bright and sunny part of the World also helped me not worry so much about this, as did my trusty tripod.

The minute you pick it up you can feel Sigma’s forerunner to their now “Art” series of lenses. Along with a metal mount, and textured housing, you do get a nice feel of quality to this lens. Then there’s the “Bulb” the big glass bulb at the front, guarded by an inbuilt petal shaped hood. Nice touch, although this does prevent you being able to use standard filter systems on it. A lens cover, which is more of a tube with a built in cap on the end of it, all very fiddly, and as it only slides on without gripping anything , it also keeps slipping off and clattering to the ground with a great metal clanking all the way down the road. I got a silicone lens cover that stretches over the front of the lens and does not come off until i want it too!

So back to how it performs on my mirrorless cameras. Before I got the M5 I had a trip to Singapore for four days. I didn’t want to take my 70d, after all getting a smaller mirrorless camera was all about reducing the weight/size of my camera bag. Four days with the Eos M and  the efm 15-45mm the Sigma 8-16, and my 55-250mm stm should tell me if i wanted to go the whole hog and get rid of the 70d and get the M5.

I had nothing else to shoot with, this was going to be a really baptism of fire, not only with the Sigma, but the eos M also. I have written about that experience and how it changed my mind so much i sold the 70D as soon as i got back and bought the M5. I called it From Canon 70D to Canon Eos M5 

Yes it was very heavy on the front of the M, actually it was more awkward as well, as its shorter than my other efs lenses and is harder to balance. Still I wanted it to work so much , well i just got on with it. I used it for street art photography, landscape, Architecture, inside the Gardens at the Bay, Inside the Jewel airport terminal , outside in Chinatown and little India and Kampong Glam. I even got the mosque in Kampong Glam, that I had visited back in 2013, and this time easily got the whole building comfortably in the frame with room to spare!

I loved the great sharp images I was getting, but missing the image stabilisation, more because the M does not have a viewfinder and holding it out at arms length with such a heavy lens for any amount of time is difficult to say the least. I knew and am right that on the M5 a viewfinder being held close to your face makes a world of difference.

When I got it on the M5, it was so much better a user experience. The viewfinder adding stabilisation like the M could not. Better balance of weight ratio to the camera body and its grip, gave for a more secure holding of this heavy lens. I don’t notice the weight either now.

I have to say that at the moment this lens is on  my M5 more often than it is not. I can and will use it on the M, but only when needed and not my first choice now. It doesn’t flare either, so actually its a very good purchase for me!

I love the drama this lens gives to interiors and skies. Let alone the amazing angles of view!

8mm on Eos M5

8mm on Eos M5

8mm on Eos M5

8mm on Eos M5

8mm on Eos M5

8mm on Eos M5

8mm on Eos M

8mm on Eos M

8mm on Eos M

8mm on Eos M

13mm on Eos m

12mm on Eos M

I love the drama this lens gives to interiors and skies. Let alone the amazing angles of view!

Eos M/Efs adaptor/Efs 55-250mm

Eos M/Efs adaptor/Efs 55-250mm

Eos M/Efs adaptor/Efs 55-250mm

Eos M5/Efs adaptor/Efs 55-250mm

Eos M5/Efs adaptor/Efs 55-250mm

Eos M5/Efs adaptor/Efs 55-250mm

Back in June 2019 I wrote about my move from the 70/75-300mm long zoom lenses to my current 55-250mm stm. 

Back again for a full years round up and how it performs with the Eos M series of mirrorless cameras. without a doubt my previous research on this lens prior to my switch from Canon 70D to mirrorless, was totally vindicated by this great lens. On my 70d it performed exactly as I had hoped and more!

Now bearing in mind I am primarily a Landscape and travel photographer, so long distant zoom is not something I want to use often, or indeed macro or close up work. So I didn’t want to go spending a huge amount of money on a long distance zoom. Enter the 55-250mm stm 

Much more lightweight (at 375g) even more than the 18-135mm! it was a real boon on the 70d, but how ws it going to feel on the mirrorless system? Well of course its bigger than its Efm counter part the Efm 55-200mm which ways in at a paltry 260g, but actually not that much of a difference in weight (around 100g). The difference you might notice more is the 55-250mm stm has a 4-5.2 aperture where as its baby cousin has a 4.5-6.3 aperture. Hmmmm methinks that the 55-250mm stm should perform better. Again many comments on the web actually sound disappointed about the Efm 55-200mm. And many prefer the slightly bulkier Efs 55-250mm.

I am with them, on the Eos M it does dwarf the camera a teeny weeny bit  more than its 18-135mm brother, but actually hardly much more actually around 10mm but for some reason feels so much lighter, well it is lol A full plastic body with an un ashamedly plastic mount! Oh the plastic mount right? (nods knowingly), well for all those that are wondering, again I have never had any problems with plastic mounts! and they seem to shave somewhere between 100-130g off the weight. Lets face it, one of the main reasons I went for the mirrorless system camera was to reduce size and or weight of camera and its combined lenses.

So Back to the Eos M, allowing for the fact that I have the added weight/length of the Efs to Efm adaptor, it is just as comfortable to hold in the same way the 18-135mm stm is . Again due to the minimal amount of grip I had been getting with the M , it is easier to carry around in the hand as a lens, with the M as the little bit on the end. Much lighter making taking long distance shots easier to keep the full focal length steady , I found little to no blurry images. This is also helped by its built in image stabilisation.  This enables me to get a few stops off the aperture(very useful at full zoom).

Now the other great thing about Super zooms is you can get close up shots without having to get close up, right? Right, I have seen and captured moon shots with this lens(yes I know, you have to crop, but then again I did when I had the 70-300mm). Boats out in the Marina without getting wet! and the other bonus getting a good degree of not quite macro, but good enough for me, shots!

Images come out as crisp and sharp on the Eos M as they ever did on my 70D. Handling on the Eos M5 is again better with a better grip and slightly more shape to the camera giving a better balance size ratio. Again it feels better on the M5 with just as sharp focusing and no fall off that I can see. In fact I have got some cracking shots with this lens and will post them below with their focal lengths for illustration. No movement between lens and camera you can get all the functions of the camera the same as it were a native lens. I really cannot recommend this lens enough for the casual zoom user. Its just stunning.

55-250mm @121mm on M5

55-250mm @ 100mm on M5

55-250mm @ 55mm on M5

55-250mm @ 218mm on M5

55-250mm @ 225mm on Eos M

55-250mm @ 225mm on Eos M

55-250mm @ 250mm on 70D

55-250mm @ 250mm on 70D

55-250mm @ 250mm on 70D

55-250mm @ 250mm on M5

55-250mm @ 250mm on M5

55-250mm @ 250mm on 70D

Eos M/Viltrox adaptor/18-135mm STM

Eos M/Viltrox adaptor/18-135mm STM

Eos M5/Viltrox adaptor/18-135mm STM

Eos M5/Viltrox adaptor/18-135mm STM

Eos M5/Viltrox adaptor/18-135mm STM

Eos M5/Viltrox adaptor/18-135mm STM

So far I have looked at my Efm native lenses (lenses that are made for the smaller mirrorless M mount system of Canon Cameras.

One of the main attractions for me and possibly for many of you reading this is the flexibility Canon gave us by creating and producing the Efs to Efm lens adaptor. I remember when these first appeared they were around £100, but seemed in 2020 to have dropped to a decent £50, secondhand of course.

I use a Viltrox Efs to Efm adaptor, which I bought new for around £30 when I bought my Eos M in October 2019. There are other makes around, Meiki, and some Chinese options. Personally I have never had any issues with the Viltrox adaptor, and would recommend it if your on a limited budget.

So what would the Efs 18-135mm stm be like on my Eos M and M5. I had previously used it as a workhorse kit lens on my now past 70D. A perfect;y balanced affair, and gave outstanding images.

Because the Efs lenses flange are bigger and deeper than the M mounts(which are smaller and shallower on account of no mirror being in the way), you have to put the extension adaptor on the back of the Efs lens before attaching it to the camera, or even putting it on the camera before attaching the lens.

The 18-135mm stm is one of Canons “Silent stepping motor” lenses. Quite often, at the beginning before I got used to it on the 70d, I would have to check it was actually working. It is totally silent.

Coming in at 515g or half a kilo and a bit, its totally plastic body seems a bit heavy? Well this one comes with a metal mount, and a good piece of glass. So of course it’s going to be heavier than say, Canons Efm 18-150mm stm which comes in at 300g. (which I don’t own yet). So I was a interested to see how it would feel balance wise.

Taking it out first with my Eos M (which was the only mirrorless I had at the time), I found that it was indeed front heavy, as I thought it would be. Equally it made a nice handful with which to carry the M around on, I.e instead of holding the M , which has no real grip, either at the front , or he back, I would carry the 18-135mm lens in my hand with the camera attached and of course with my Para-cord wrist strap for extra safety. Then it became/becomes a whole different way of working, and much more comfortable. There’s no getting away from it, it is big on the M, especially when extended out to it’s fullest 135mm. But it still takes amazingly sharp images, just as long as you can hold the Eos M steady, or be using a very fast shutter speed. It really tasks your “holding your camera properly” abilities. I personally like it as I usually hold my camera and lens whilst shooting.

Now on the M5 it becomes a much better balanced lens. I think as I mentioned before, the lack of holding points on the Eos M make it difficult to manage. Not so on the M5, you don’t find yourself wrestling with the zoom whilst trying not to drop or keep your camera level. Again the images were fab. No sharpness fall off, quick snap focus, in spite of there being an adaptor between the two bits of equipment. There was no looseness or disconnect between the lens and the body and actually feels like it was made to pair with the M5.

Am I ready to give it up for the more compact 18-150mm stm? not yet, losing 25mm might not sound like much, but in the real World its quite a drop in focal length. As this is such a great Travel lens and covers such a useful range I think its a great addition to the M range of cameras as a versatile lens. With a 67mm filter thread on the front, it falls still into the “affordable filter” range. Again though no swapping them out with the smaller Efm lens, without step up rings.

Images are added below this post with their focal lengths to illustrate the lenses ability Taken with the Eos M

Efs 18-135mm stm at 85mm

Efs 18-135mm stm at 50mm

Efs 18-135mm stm at 135mm

Efs 18-135mm stm at 20mm

Efs 18-135mm stm at 24mm

Efs 18-135mm stm at 89mm

Efs 18-135mm stm at 135mm

Efm 15-45mm on M5

Efm 15-45mm on M5

Efm 15-45mm on M5

Efm 15-45mm with Eos M

Efm 15-45mm with Eos M

Efm 15-45mm with Eos M

The first Lens on camera I am going to discuss is the Canon Efm 15-45mm stm.

I have chosen this one first, not only because it it the smallest and lightest, but it is also the most versatile and used lens that I find myself using with this mirrorless camera system.

The Canon Efm 15-45mm stm came out after canons Efm 18-55mm stm(to be reviewed shortly). This small and seemingly wider angle view lens took it’s place as the standard kit lens from the 18-55mm primarily because of its lighter and at the time cheaper production and price. I got mine (at the time of writing this post) for the small price of around £31, as the owner had got it as a boxed kit lens and didn’t want it.

It is entirely made of plastic, except of course for the lens elements. Personally I have used plastic lens mounts for years and have never had any issues, either with the mount or its strength on remaining fixed to the camera. The same goes for this stonking little lens.

With a 24-72mm full frame equivalent (15x 1.6 and 45 x1.6) this becomes a very useful lens in every sense.

I find myself using it mostly when i just want to take one lens out with me on one camera. Small and light with a perfectly acceptable aperture of 3.5-6.3, but still better than some. As I commented on my opening page Cameras with their Lenses, it is also the lightest of all the Canon lenses. A great boon for the casual photographer and traveller alike. With its 49mm filter thread size, this also makes for inexpensive filter purchases.

From my personal use, I have found it great for producing good colour rendition, with reasonable sharpness to the edges. Snap quick to focus and totally reliable shot after shot. It makes the Canon Eos M a super compact APSC camera , so small it pops into my handbag all the time, so I know I can get opportune quality images at any given moment. On the Eos M5 , it also keeps its small an useful, lightweight form factor, and yes still small enough on it’s own to carry in a handbag.

Do I recommend this lens? hell yes! would I be without it? no way, Do I use it often? Yes of course, The fact that its on either one of my to M series cameras at any one time speaks volumes about its usefulness on the mirrorless system. Now I know there are shed fulls of reviews out there, all have their points, but what I think using your lenses and cameras is about is not the spec sheet, but actually how much you really use them. This little gem of a lens is one of those “go to” lenses, no doubt for me.

You can read about my review of the 15-45mm stm lens on this link  

The images below are examples of what this lens can produce, I have given the MM length shot with to help.

15mm

15mm

21mm

28mm

30mm

34mm

40mm